New Hampshire Call Recording Laws: All-Party Consent
New Hampshire requires all parties' consent to record a call (RSA 570-A:2). A party who records with one-party consent commits a misdemeanor. How to comply.
New Hampshire requires the consent of all parties to record a phone call or private conversation. Under RSA 570-A:2, recording without anyone's consent is a class B felony, and even a participant who records with only their own consent commits a misdemeanor. People recorded can also sue.
New Hampshire is the strict state in northern New England. Maine and Vermont businesses calling New Hampshire customers need to follow its rule too.
This is general information, not legal advice.
New Hampshire recording law at a glance
| Question | Answer in New Hampshire |
|---|---|
| Consent rule | All parties |
| Main statute | RSA 570-A:2 |
| Recording with no party's consent | Class B felony |
| Participant recording without others' consent | Misdemeanor (RSA 570-A:2, I-a) |
| Civil remedy | RSA 570-A:11: at least $100/day or $1,000, punitive damages, fees |
| Business premises | Interception on business premises is expressly covered |
What the statute says
RSA 570-A:2, I says a person is guilty of a class B felony if, except as the chapter provides "or without the consent of all parties to the communication," the person:
- willfully intercepts, or tries to intercept, any telecommunication or oral communication;
- uses a device to intercept oral communications when the device is connected to a wire, transmits by radio, or is used on the premises of a business or to obtain information about a business's operations;
- willfully discloses the contents of a communication knowing it was illegally intercepted; or
- willfully uses those contents knowing they were illegally intercepted.
RSA 570-A:2, I-a then sets a lesser offense:
"A person is guilty of a misdemeanor if, except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter or without consent of all parties to the communication, the person knowingly intercepts a telecommunication or oral communication when the person is a party to the communication or with the prior consent of one of the parties to the communication..."
So New Hampshire treats a participant's secret recording as a crime, just a less serious one.
The business-premises clause
New Hampshire expressly covers devices used "on premises of any business or other commercial establishment" or to obtain information "relating to the operations of any business." Recording conversations in a workplace without everyone's consent is squarely within the statute.
What the misdemeanor tier means
Paragraph I-a separates a participant's secret recording from an outsider's eavesdropping. The outsider faces a class B felony; the participant faces a misdemeanor. That distinction reflects how serious each act is, but it does not make participant recording lawful, and it does not affect civil liability. For a business, the difference between a felony and a misdemeanor is not a compliance strategy. The goal is to avoid both by getting consent from everyone on the call.
Consent by knowledge
According to the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (RCFP), the New Hampshire Supreme Court held in State v. Locke (1999) that a party effectively consented when the circumstances showed they knew the communication was being recorded. In Fischer v. Hooper (1999), the court said a jury should consider a person's actions as well as words in deciding consent.
The court also held in State v. Lott (2005) that people who send email or instant messages implicitly consent to their recording, because the recipient's device must record them to display them.
For phone calls, a recording notice at the start of the call, followed by the caller continuing, is the clearest way to show knowledge and consent.
Penalties
| Violation | Statute | Classification | Maximum (per RCFP) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interception without any party's consent | 570-A:2, I | Class B felony | 7 years, $4,000 |
| Participant recording without others' consent | 570-A:2, I-a | Misdemeanor | 1 year, $2,000 |
| Disclosing or using illegally intercepted contents | 570-A:2, I(c)-(d) | Class B felony | 7 years |
| Recording in a private place | RSA 644:9 | Misdemeanor | — |
Civil liability
According to the RCFP, RSA 570-A:11 lets anyone whose communication was intercepted, disclosed or used in violation of the chapter recover the greater of actual damages, $100 a day for each day of violation, or $1,000, plus punitive damages, attorney's fees and costs.
Calls between New Hampshire and neighboring states
| Neighbor | Rule for phone calls |
|---|---|
| Massachusetts | All-party; no secret recording |
| Maine | One-party |
| Vermont | No statute; one-party in practice |
Southern New Hampshire is part of the Boston economy, and Massachusetts also prohibits secret recording. Maine and Vermont are one-party, but their businesses calling New Hampshire customers should get consent. Read interstate call recording consent and see the state-by-state table.
Three New Hampshire scenarios
A Manchester insurance agency plays "This call may be recorded" at the start of every call. Callers know and continue. That supports consent by all parties.
A Nashua salesperson records a phone negotiation on a cellphone app without telling the buyer. The salesperson is a party, so RSA 570-A:2, I-a applies: a misdemeanor, plus civil exposure of at least $1,000.
A Portsmouth business owner hides a recorder in the office to capture employee conversations. No party consented, and the device is on business premises. That is a class B felony.
What this means for New Hampshire businesses
Retail and tourism
Ski areas, lake rentals and retailers take calls from Massachusetts and beyond. Announce recording on every recorded call.
Professional services
Law, accounting and financial firms should get explicit consent and keep tight control of recordings.
Employees
Employees are parties too. Get written consent to recording of business calls, and do not record workplace conversations without everyone's knowledge.
Recording threatening or harassing calls
Businesses sometimes want to record abusive callers. New Hampshire's all-party rule makes that harder than in one-party states, and the statute's exceptions are mostly for law enforcement and communications carriers. If your staff receive threatening calls, report them to police, who can act under the chapter's procedures, and use your phone system's call logs to document dates and times. Announcing recording on every call also solves the problem in advance: a caller who continues after hearing the notice has been told.
New Hampshire recording checklist
- Recording notice before conversation on recorded inbound calls
- Disclosure in the opening line of outbound recorded calls
- No secret recording by staff, even of their own calls
- Written employee consent to call recording
- No hidden recording devices on business premises
- Callers who object are not recorded
- Access controls and retention schedule
Wording is in call recording disclosure scripts.
Recording calls in New Hampshire with Callata
Callata never records a call silently. With recording turned on, both sides hear "This call may be recorded." as the call connects, inbound and outbound. Recorded calls are transcribed and summarized with sentiment and action items on the contact's history. Callata's terms keep consent-law compliance with you. Pricing starts at $99 a month for five users, and each user after that adds $20 a month. Get started.
Frequently asked questions
Is New Hampshire a two-party consent state?
Yes. RSA 570-A:2 makes it a crime to intercept a telecommunication or oral communication without the consent of all parties, with limited exceptions.
What if I am a party to the call and record it without telling the other person?
RSA 570-A:2, I-a makes that a misdemeanor: a person who intercepts a communication they are a party to, or with one party's prior consent, but without all parties' consent, commits a misdemeanor rather than a felony.
What is the penalty for recording without any party's consent?
Intercepting a communication without the consent of all parties, outside the I-a situation, is a class B felony. The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press lists up to seven years in prison.
Does knowing about the recording count as consent in New Hampshire?
Courts have found consent where circumstances showed a party knew the communication was being recorded, for example State v. Locke (1999), according to the RCFP. A clear notice at the start of the call is the reliable way to show it.